Back to writings

The Hidden Cost of AI Wrapper Products

3 min read

Every week I see another AI wrapper launch. Clean interface, clever prompt, $29/month subscription. Most will be dead in six months.

The math is brutal: if your entire value proposition is a better prompt, you're competing on the thinnest possible moat. Your customers are one ChatGPT feature update away from churning.

I've built and consulted on dozens of AI products. The ones that survive aren't wrappers—they're systems. Here's what separates the two.

The Wrapper Trap

Most AI wrappers follow the same playbook:

  1. Take a popular use case (writing emails, generating images, analyzing data)
  2. Build a simple UI around GPT-4 or Claude
  3. Add some prompt engineering
  4. Launch with a subscription model

The problem isn't execution—it's strategy. You're building on rented land with no defensibility.

I watched a promising email writing tool get crushed when Gmail added AI compose. Their entire business model evaporated overnight because they never built beyond the prompt layer.

What Actually Creates Value

The AI products that stick around solve three problems that prompts alone can't handle:

1. The Integration Layer

Real work happens across multiple systems. A prompt can't pull data from your CRM, update your project management tool, and send a Slack notification.

I built a marketing analytics agent that connects GA4, Google Ads, Search Console, and client CRMs. The AI analysis is maybe 20% of the value—the other 80% is the integration layer that makes it actually useful.

2. Domain-Specific Workflows

Generic AI is powerful but generic. Value comes from understanding specific workflows and building around them.

Take legal document review. A wrapper might summarize contracts. A system understands that lawyers need to:

  • Flag specific clause types
  • Compare against standard language
  • Track changes across versions
  • Generate redlines in the right format
  • Integrate with matter management systems

The AI is table stakes. The workflow knowledge is the moat.

3. Human-in-the-Loop Architecture

Most business processes can't be fully automated. They need human judgment at key decision points.

Successful AI products design for this from day one. They don't try to replace humans—they augment them with better tools and information.

The Real Costs of Wrapping

Building a sustainable AI product means solving problems that go far beyond the prompt:

Data Integration: Real systems need to connect to existing tools and databases. That's months of API work, not hours of prompt tuning.

Reliability: Production systems need error handling, retries, monitoring, and fallbacks. When your AI fails at 2 AM, customers need alternatives.

Compliance: Enterprise customers need audit trails, data governance, and security controls. These requirements shape your entire architecture.

Scalability: As usage grows, you need infrastructure that can handle load, manage costs, and maintain performance.

None of this shows up in your MVP, but all of it determines whether you have a business in year two.

Building Beyond the Wrapper

The companies winning in AI aren't the ones with the best prompts—they're the ones solving complete problems.

Start with a specific workflow in a domain you understand. Map out every step, every integration point, every decision that requires human judgment. Then build the system that makes that workflow 10x better.

The AI is just one component. The defensible value is in understanding the problem deeply enough to build the right solution around it.

Want to discuss your AI product strategy? I help companies build systems that last beyond the next model update. Let's talk.